Tag Archives: Volatility

Daily Meeting for Wednesday April 9

Cleaning Up Late Entries and Rebuilding First-Trigger Trust

• Team hesitated on a clean early breakout in tech, then chased late with worse fills and less conviction.

• Ernie reiterated: execution must happen at the first trigger—not on the retest, not “once it looks better.”

• “Chase recovery” behavior highlighted, where skipped A-setups led to overtrading during midday chop.

• Reinforcement of entry tagging system—Clear, Gray, or Choppy—to build data around trade quality.

• Reminder to use starter size on A-setups, especially when price hits the exact level discussed in prep.

• Thursday goal re-set: everyone must execute the first A-tier setup with starter size—no filters, no second-guessing.

Summary

the team broke down another missed A-tier trade in the tech sector. Despite price hitting the planned level with confirmation, several traders hesitated and waited for “better” entries. When they did act, it was late—leading to worse fills and shaken conviction.

Ernie called out this pattern as “chase recovery,” where the guilt of missing clean setups leads to overtrading lower-quality ones during midday chop. The team reviewed trade logs showing how this sequence consistently results in worse outcomes.

To correct this, everyone recommitted to first-touch execution using starter size, especially when price taps a pre-marked level. The tagging system (Clear, Gray, Choppy) was reinforced as a self-assessment tool to help categorize and reflect on execution quality.

Thursday’s goal was reset: every trader must take the first clean A-tier setup at trigger—no hesitation, no edits.

Daily Meeting for Tuesday April 8

Breaking the Hesitation Loop and Re-Training Entry Precision

• Clean A-tier setup in healthcare was skipped, despite pre-market levels being hit almost exactly.

• Over-analysis at execution point was flagged again—team hesitated waiting for confirmation that wasn’t required.

• Ernie reframed the “risk” as actually the safer choice, because skipping aligned setups leads to inconsistent, lower-quality trades later.

• Reinforcement of “starter size first” protocol, encouraging immediate entry to reduce emotional delay.

• Review of strong mid-morning reversal, where several traders chased entries too late, leading to poor average fills.

• Wednesday challenge reset: everyone must execute the first clean A-tier setup on first trigger—starter size, no delay.

Summary

the team reviewed another missed early-session opportunity—this time in a healthcare name that triggered almost exactly at the pre-marked level. The recurring theme of hesitation returned, with traders waiting for “extra” confirmation not required by the setup criteria.

Ernie pointed out that the perceived safety in waiting is actually more dangerous—because it causes missed clean setups and often leads to chasing lower-quality trades later in the day. He encouraged everyone to shift that mindset: taking the pre-planned setup is actually the safer and more consistent move.

The team recommitted to using starter size immediately on clean triggers as a way to bypass emotional hesitation and stay aligned with the plan. A breakdown of a strong mid-morning reversal showed how delayed entries created poor average fills and reduced edge.

To close, Ernie reissued the team challenge: everyone must execute the first clean A-tier setup on first trigger tomorrow—starter size, no edits, no hesitation.

Daily Meeting for Monday March 31

Executing Without Delay and Recommitting to Tiered Trade Prioritization

• Missed breakout in large-cap tech despite it being labeled an A-tier setup during pre-market planning.

• Over-analysis of volume confirmation caused hesitation, even when price action already validated the move.

• Refinement to ‘big ass fly’ strategy, focusing on taking partial size entries immediately on key level breaks.

• Emphasis on trusting morning prep, with several missed trades aligning perfectly with pre-drawn levels.

• New accountability system introduced, requiring each trader to note their first hesitation moment of the day for post-session review.

• Reinforced hierarchy of setups, committing to instant execution on A-tier trades regardless of recent trade outcomes.

Summary

the team examined another missed A-tier opportunity in large-cap tech—despite it aligning cleanly with the pre-market plan. Ernie pointed out that volume analysis was over-applied, causing hesitation even after the price had confirmed the level break.

To address this, the team made further refinements to the ‘big ass fly’ strategy—especially using partial size to enter quickly on key breaks and remove execution paralysis. The importance of trusting pre-market work was reinforced, as multiple setups played out exactly as planned but weren’t acted on.

A new accountability system was introduced: each trader will now log their first hesitation moment of the day for end-of-session review, helping to build self-awareness and reduce repeat patterns. Finally, Ernie stressed that trade priority must be respected—if it’s an A-tier setup, it gets executed immediately, regardless of what happened earlier in the session.

Daily Meeting for Friday March 21

Prioritizing Precision Entries and Managing Sector Rotations

• Missed early opportunities in energy stocks, where the team hesitated despite confirmation of breakout setups.

• Refinements to the ‘big ass fly’ strategy, emphasizing tighter entry zones and faster profit-taking in high-volatility conditions.

• Increased focus on volume confirmation, requiring alignment with price action to validate trade entries more effectively.

• Discussion on dynamic stop-loss placement, adapting stops in real time based on volatility rather than fixed point systems.

• Shift in sector allocation, moving away from underperforming financials and targeting momentum plays in healthcare and tech.

• Commitment to avoiding overtrading, particularly during midday chop, reinforcing patience until clearer setups form.

Summary

the team analyzed missed opportunities in energy sector breakouts, emphasizing the need to act quickly when setups meet predefined criteria. Ernie stressed refining the ‘big ass fly’ strategy by focusing on tighter entry zones and speeding up profit-taking in high-volatility situations.

The session covered increasing the emphasis on volume confirmation, ensuring that price movement aligns with volume spikes before taking trades. Dynamic stop-loss placement was also discussed, with a shift away from static stops toward real-time adjustments based on current volatility.

Sector rotation analysis led to the decision to move capital away from underperforming financial stocks and focus more on healthcare and tech momentum plays. Ernie concluded by reinforcing discipline, encouraging the team to avoid overtrading during less active periods and only engage when setups offer clear potential.

Trump vs. Powell: The Hidden Battle Over Inflation and Interest Rates

Trump vs. Powell: The Hidden Battle Over Inflation and Interest Rates

Introduction: The Economic Showdown in 2025

The ongoing battle between President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is more than just political theater—it’s a fundamental clash over inflation, interest rates, and economic policy. Powell and the Fed argue that inflation is driven by strong economic growth, while Trump believes that excessive government spending is the real cause. Their differences could shape everything from Federal Reserve policy to stock market volatility in 2025.

For traders and investors, the stakes are high. If Powell sticks to his cautious stance, we may see higher interest rates for longer, creating market uncertainty. If Trump gets his way and forces rate cuts, it could trigger a market rally, though inflation risks remain. Either way, volatility is here to stay, making this showdown critical for anyone watching the markets.

The Federal Reserve’s Blind Spot: Ignoring Government Spending

For years, the Federal Reserve (Fed) has framed inflation as a natural result of economic expansion. When consumer spending rises, businesses increase prices, and wages go up, inflation follows—or at least that’s the Fed’s traditional thinking. This perspective led to serious policy missteps during the post-pandemic recovery, when the Fed failed to anticipate the inflationary impact of massive government stimulus packages.

Between 2020 and 2021, the U.S. government injected over $5 trillion into the economy through stimulus checks, unemployment benefits, and business bailouts. This led to an explosion in consumer demand, with personal savings rates soaring to 33.8% in April 2020. As the economy reopened, businesses were overwhelmed by demand, but supply chains were still constrained. The result? Inflation surged to 9.1% by mid-2022, the highest in 40 years.

Despite these clear signals, the Fed largely downplayed the role of fiscal policy in driving inflation. Powell and his team focused on supply chain disruptions, labor market tightness, and strong consumer demand, rather than acknowledging that government spending had injected too much money into the system. Fast forward to 2025, and Powell is still repeating the same pattern. His March 19th comments on inflation focused on tariffs and a “solid” economy, while barely mentioning the impact of federal spending.

Trump’s Strategy: Cutting Government Spending to Curb Inflation

Trump’s economic strategy is radically different. His administration, backed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy—is focused on reducing federal spending by $2 trillion annually. The goal is to curb inflation by cutting government expenditures, rather than relying on high interest rates to slow down demand.

DOGE’s primary mission is to eliminate waste and redundant government programs while modernizing federal operations. Musk has proposed moving government services to cloud-based infrastructure, which he claims could save billions. The administration is also targeting Medicare, Medicaid, and defense spending, arguing that these areas have grown inefficient and bloated.

Trump believes that if government spending is significantly reduced, inflation will decline naturally, allowing the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates without fear of another inflation spike. However, Powell remains skeptical, and the Fed has yet to factor these spending reductions into its inflation forecasts.

Trump vs. Powell: The Battle Over Interest Rates

Trump’s frustration with Powell is intensifying because the Fed has refused to lower interest rates, even as the administration takes aggressive steps to rein in spending. Powell maintains that inflation—projected at 2.8% (Core PCE) for 2025—remains too high, particularly due to Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico (25% starting April 2025).

Trump argues that the Fed’s inflation model is flawed. He believes that lower government spending should reduce inflationary pressures, allowing for interest rate cuts without triggering another surge in prices. Powell, on the other hand, sees tariffs as inflationary and fears that cutting rates too soon could lead to renewed price increases, particularly if Trump’s tax cuts stimulate consumer demand.

This disagreement is creating major uncertainty in financial markets. If Trump pressures Powell into cutting rates, stocks could rally, but if Powell holds firm, interest rates may stay elevated longer than expected. The result? Continued volatility in equities, bonds, and commodities.

Does Trump Have a Point on Interest Rate Cuts?

Trump’s case for rate cuts makes sense in a specific context. If DOGE succeeds in reducing $2 trillion in spending, inflationary pressures could ease, giving the Fed room to lower rates without fueling another price surge. However, there are risks.

If Trump’s tax cuts significantly boost consumer spending, the inflationary effects of reduced government spending could be offset. Similarly, if tariffs increase costs for businesses, those expenses may be passed on to consumers, leading to higher prices despite budget cuts. Powell’s hesitation, while frustrating to Trump, is rooted in these concerns.

What This Means for Traders and Investors

For 0DTE (zero days to expiration) traders, the Trump-Powell feud is a gift. Market volatility is increasing, creating profitable opportunities in options trading.

• If Powell resists Trump’s push for rate cuts, expect more market uncertainty and larger intraday swings, which benefits traders who thrive on volatility.

• If Trump successfully pressures Powell into lowering rates, markets could experience a strong upward move, creating opportunities for trend-following strategies.

• DOGE’s success—or failure—will be a key factor in inflation forecasts, meaning traders must stay informed about spending cuts and fiscal policy shifts.

Conclusion: Volatility Is Our Ally

The Trump-Powell standoff over inflation and interest rates is far from over. Trump’s push for spending cuts and Powell’s cautious approach to rate reductions will keep markets on edge, making volatility a defining feature of 2025.

For traders, this presents exciting opportunities to capitalize on market swings. Whether rates stay high or begin to drop, the key will be staying ahead of policy changes and reacting to shifts in economic sentiment.

As this economic showdown continues, traders who adapt to the uncertainty will thrive.

Coach Ernie out. 🚀

Daily Meeting for Wednesday March 12

Refining Trade Precision and Reacting to Midweek Market Shifts

• Late reaction to early energy sector strength, with missed opportunities on initial breakouts due to slow execution.

• Focus on adapting the ‘big ass fly’ strategy to capture short bursts of momentum instead of waiting for trend continuation.

• Reevaluation of stop placement, after two trades were stopped out prematurely by minor pullbacks before resuming the trend.

• Adjustment in watchlist prioritization, emphasizing small-cap tech stocks showing relative strength during mid-morning rotation.

• Reinforcement of taking partial profits early, especially in choppy conditions where full moves didn’t materialize as expected.

• Discussion on maintaining execution discipline, avoiding revenge trades after early losses and sticking to planned setups.

Summary

the team focused on execution timing issues, particularly regarding missed trades in the energy sector due to delayed reactions to early breakout signals. Ernie emphasized the need to adapt the ‘big ass fly’ strategy to favor quicker profit targets by capitalizing on short bursts of momentum rather than waiting for extended trends.

There was a reevaluation of stop placement techniques after a couple of trades were closed prematurely, only for the setups to recover and play out as expected. The team also discussed improving watchlist prioritization, shifting more focus toward small-cap tech names that demonstrated relative strength during sector rotation.

Partial profit-taking strategies were reinforced, especially in choppy markets where full position holds became less effective. Ernie concluded the session with a reminder to maintain execution discipline, avoiding emotional trading and focusing on high-probability, pre-planned setups.

Daily Meeting Thursday March 6

Trade Execution and Risk Control for Market Uncertainty

• Navigating Unstable Market Conditions: Discussion on how shifting sentiment affected trade setups and execution.

• Refinements to the ‘big ass fly’ strategy: Adjustments to improve trade timing and adaptability in volatile sessions.

• Enhancing Entry and Exit Strategies: Emphasis on using technical indicators and trend confirmations to optimize trade decisions.

• Dynamic Stop-Loss Adjustments: Review of premature trade exits and strategies for maintaining risk control without limiting trade potential.

• Sector Performance Review: Analysis of market trends in financials and tech, highlighting potential trade opportunities.

• Maintaining a Disciplined Approach: Encouragement to avoid overtrading and focus on high-probability setups despite market uncertainty.

Summary

the team discussed how shifting market sentiment created challenges in trade execution and risk management. Ernie led a review of necessary refinements to the ‘big ass fly’ strategy, focusing on improving timing and adaptability to handle increased volatility.

A key focus was placed on enhancing entry and exit strategies, ensuring trades were backed by strong technical confirmation and trend alignment. Risk management strategies were revisited, with an emphasis on adjusting stop-loss levels dynamically to prevent premature exits while still controlling exposure.

Sector-specific analysis highlighted trends in financials and tech, with potential trade setups identified for upcoming sessions. Ernie concluded the meeting by reinforcing the importance of maintaining discipline, urging traders to focus on high-probability setups and avoid overtrading during uncertain market conditions.

Sunday Retrospective for March 2

Lessons from Market Volatility and Execution Adjustments

• Review of Market Volatility Trends: Analysis of how price swings affected trade execution and strategy performance.

• Assessment of the ‘big ass fly’ strategy: Discussion on its effectiveness during high-volatility sessions and necessary refinements.

• Identifying Missed Opportunities: Examination of delayed trade entries and methods for improving reaction time.

• Enhancing Risk Management Strategies: Adjustments to stop-loss techniques to mitigate losses while allowing trades room to develop.

• Sector Analysis for the Upcoming Week: Focus on emerging trends in tech and energy for potential trade setups.

• Setting Goals for the Week Ahead: Prioritizing precision in trade entries, improving risk management, and maintaining patience in execution.

Summary

the team analyzed how market volatility impacted recent trade setups and execution performance. Ernie led a review of the ‘big ass fly’ strategy, discussing its strengths and areas for refinement to adapt to high-volatility trading conditions.

Missed trade opportunities due to delayed entries were examined, with strategies proposed for improving reaction time. Risk management adjustments were also discussed, with a focus on optimizing stop-loss placement to minimize losses while keeping trades open long enough to develop.

Sector-specific analysis highlighted potential opportunities in tech and energy markets, with key trends identified for the upcoming week. The team set clear goals, emphasizing trade precision, disciplined risk management, and patience in execution. Ernie concluded the session by encouraging the team to apply the lessons learned and stay adaptable to market fluctuations.

Daily Meeting for Friday February 28

Refining Trade Execution Strategies for End-of-Month Market Trends

• Navigating End-of-Month Volatility: Discussion on how institutional adjustments impacted price action and trade setups.

• Refinements to the ‘big ass fly’ strategy: Adjustments to improve execution in fast-moving conditions.

• Identifying Market Exhaustion Points: Review of recent trade setups that failed due to weak follow-through.

• Dynamic Risk Management Adjustments: Techniques for modifying stop-loss levels based on evolving market trends.

• Sector Performance Review: Analysis of financials and energy markets for potential trade opportunities.

• Emphasizing Trade Patience: Reinforcement of waiting for ideal setups rather than forcing trades in uncertain conditions.

Summary

the team discussed how end-of-month volatility and institutional rebalancing affected market conditions and trade execution. Ernie emphasized key refinements to the ‘big ass fly’ strategy, focusing on improving its effectiveness in rapidly shifting price movements.

A critical point of discussion was identifying market exhaustion points, analyzing setups that failed due to weak follow-through, and how to adjust strategies accordingly. Risk management was also addressed, with techniques introduced for modifying stop-loss placements in response to evolving trends.

Sector-specific analysis highlighted key movements in financials and energy, providing potential trade setups for the upcoming sessions. Ernie concluded the meeting by stressing the importance of trade patience, encouraging the team to wait for high-quality setups rather than taking unnecessary risks in uncertain market conditions.

Daily Meeting for Thursday February 27

Strategic Adjustments for Volatile Market Conditions

• Reacting to Unstable Price Movements: Discussion on how unpredictable intraday swings affected trade execution and strategy adjustments.

• Refining the ‘big ass fly’ strategy: Modifications aimed at enhancing performance in rapidly shifting market conditions.

• Strengthening Trade Confirmation Criteria: Emphasis on combining multiple indicators to reduce false signals and improve entry precision.

• Risk Management in High-Volatility Environments: Adjustments to stop-loss placements to better handle sudden reversals.

• Sector-Specific Insights: Analysis of increased volatility in financials and tech, with a focus on potential breakout opportunities.

• Maintaining Emotional Discipline: Reinforcement of structured trading plans and avoiding overreaction to market fluctuations.

Summary

the team discussed the impact of unstable price movements on recent trades and how to adapt execution strategies accordingly. Ernie led a session on refining the ‘big ass fly’ strategy to enhance its effectiveness in fast-moving market conditions.

A key focus was placed on strengthening trade confirmation criteria, with an emphasis on using multiple indicators to improve entry precision and reduce false signals. Risk management strategies were also reviewed, with stop-loss adjustments introduced to better manage sudden market reversals.

Sector analysis highlighted notable volatility in financials and tech, presenting potential breakout opportunities for upcoming trades. Ernie concluded the meeting by reinforcing the importance of emotional discipline, urging traders to stick to structured trading plans and avoid overreacting to short-term price swings.